fuji xh1 vs sony a6500

Mostnotable I also examine the somewhat quirky decision one has to make when deciding to go for the fujifilm xt3 vs the fujifilm xh1, or even versus just staying with your old and clunky xt2. Fujifilm X-T3 body & bundles at Amazon, B&H, Adorama. Up to $550 off on Fujifilm X-H1 body & bundles at Amazon, B&H, Adorama. FujifilmX-H1 vs Sony Alpha a6500 Fujifilm X-H1 Sony Alpha a6500 Mengapa Fujifilm X-H1 lebih baik daripada Sony Alpha a6500? Megapiksel kamera utama 0.41% lebih besar? 24.3MP vs 24.2MP 27.27% lebih cepat memotret AF pada resolusi tertinggi sebagai format JPEG? 14fps vs 11fps Shutter speed maksimal 50% lebih tinggi? 1/8000s vs 0.00025s TheSony a6500 feels more modern but offers fewer physical controls. The Fuji X-T2 has a more traditional feel thanks to the various dials that recall the days of analog SLRs. The a6500 has a standard shooting mode dial on top. The exposure settings can be controlled with two dials. XH1 vs A6500 by camerasize. Today Fuji announced the new X-H1 (specs at BH). As usual with Fuji this looks like a well-rounded product which also comes with some special and newly announced Cine lenses. When compared with the A6500 the X-H1 is a more advanced video tool. But I think Sony hasn't too much to be worried about. Vay Tien Nhanh Home Credit. Comparison Max. image resolution 6000 x 4000 6000 x 4000 Sensor Sensor size x mm x mm Sensor resolution 6058 x 4012 6045 x 4003 Diagonal mm mm Sensor size comparison Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera. Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the sensor, the better the image quality. Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older. Learn more about sensor sizes » Actual sensor size Note Actual size is set to screen → change » vs 1 1 ratio Fujifilm X-H1 Sony Alpha a6500 Surface area Difference 0 mm² 0% X-H1 and Alpha a6500 sensors are the same size. Note You are comparing cameras of different generations. There is a 2 year gap between Fujifilm X-H1 2018 and Sony Alpha a6500 2016. All things being equal, newer sensor generations generally outperform the older. Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel photosite to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other. The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range. Difference µm Pixel pitch of Alpha a6500 is approx. higher than pixel pitch of X-H1. Pixel area µm² µm² Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered. The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel. Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions more detail for a given sensor size. Relative pixel sizes Pixel area difference µm² A pixel on Sony Alpha a6500 sensor is approx. bigger than a pixel on Fujifilm X-H1. Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one square cm of the sensor. Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels. Difference µm Fujifilm X-H1 has approx. higher pixel density than Sony Alpha a6500. To learn about the accuracy of these numbers, click here. Specs Effective megapixels ISO sensitivity Auto, 200-12800 extends to 100-51200 Auto, 100-25600 expandable to 51200 Focal length 35mm equiv. Aperture priority Yes Yes Max. aperture 35mm equiv. n/a n/a Metering Multi, Center-weighted, Spot Multi, Center-weighted, Spot Exposure compensation ±5 EV in 1/3 EV steps ±5 EV in 1/3 EV, 1/2 EV steps Min. shutter speed 30 sec 30 sec Max. shutter speed 1/8000 sec 1/4000 sec Viewfinder Electronic Electronic White balance presets 7 8 Screen resolution 1,040,000 dots 921,600 dots Max. video resolution 4096x2160 24p 3840x2160 30p/25p/24p Storage types SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC/MS PRO Duo USB USB 5 GBit/sec USB 480 Mbit/sec Battery NP-W126S lithium-ion battery NP-FW50 Lithium-ion battery Dimensions x x mm 120 x x mm Choose cameras to compare Popular comparisons Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Nikon D750 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Fujifilm X-T3 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Sony Alpha A7 III Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Nikon D500 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Canon EOS 5D Mark III Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Canon EOS R Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Fujifilm X-T2 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Nikon D810 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Nikon D7200 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Fujifilm X-T1 Diagonal Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem where w = sensor width and h = sensor height Fujifilm X-H1 diagonal w = mm h = mm Diagonal = √ + = mm Sony Alpha a6500 diagonal w = mm h = mm Diagonal = √ + = mm Surface area Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor. X-H1 sensor area Width = mm Height = mm Surface area = × = mm² Alpha a6500 sensor area Width = mm Height = mm Surface area = × = mm² Pixel pitch Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the next measured in micrometers µm. It can be calculated with the following formula Pixel pitch = sensor width in mm × 1000 sensor resolution width in pixels X-H1 pixel pitch Sensor width = mm Sensor resolution width = 6058 pixels Pixel pitch = × 1000 = µm 6058 Alpha a6500 pixel pitch Sensor width = mm Sensor resolution width = 6045 pixels Pixel pitch = × 1000 = µm 6045 Pixel area The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch Pixel area = pixel pitch² You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels Pixel area = sensor surface area in mm² effective megapixels X-H1 pixel area Pixel pitch = µm Pixel area = = µm² Alpha a6500 pixel area Pixel pitch = µm Pixel area = = µm² Pixel density Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula Pixel density = sensor resolution width in pixels ² / 1000000 sensor width in cm One could also use this formula Pixel density = effective megapixels × 1000000 / 10000 sensor surface area in mm² X-H1 pixel density Sensor resolution width = 6058 pixels Sensor width = cm Pixel density = 6058 / / 1000000 = MP/cm² Alpha a6500 pixel density Sensor resolution width = 6045 pixels Sensor width = cm Pixel density = 6045 / / 1000000 = MP/cm² Sensor resolution Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher than maximum not interpolated image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications. Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula. For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages. 1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter aspect ratio. It's usually 43 or 32, but not always. 2. With the ratio r known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels X × r × X = effective megapixels × 1000000 → X = √ effective megapixels × 1000000 r 3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio Resolution horizontal X × r Resolution vertical X X-H1 sensor resolution Sensor width = mm Sensor height = mm Effective megapixels = r = = X = √ × 1000000 = 4012 Resolution horizontal X × r = 4012 × = 6058 Resolution vertical X = 4012 Sensor resolution = 6058 x 4012 Alpha a6500 sensor resolution Sensor width = mm Sensor height = mm Effective megapixels = r = = X = √ × 1000000 = 4003 Resolution horizontal X × r = 4003 × = 6045 Resolution vertical X = 4003 Sensor resolution = 6045 x 4003 Crop factor Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal of 35 mm film mm with the diagonal of the sensor. Crop factor = mm sensor diagonal in mm X-H1 crop factor Sensor diagonal in mm = mm Crop factor = = Alpha a6500 crop factor Sensor diagonal in mm = mm Crop factor = = 35 mm equivalent aperture Equivalent aperture in 135 film terms is calculated by multiplying lens aperture with crop factor focal length multiplier. X-H1 equivalent aperture Aperture is a lens characteristic, so it's calculated only for fixed lens cameras. If you want to know the equivalent aperture for Fujifilm X-H1, take the aperture of the lens you're using and multiply it with crop factor. Crop factor for Fujifilm X-H1 is Alpha a6500 equivalent aperture Aperture is a lens characteristic, so it's calculated only for fixed lens cameras. If you want to know the equivalent aperture for Sony Alpha a6500, take the aperture of the lens you're using and multiply it with crop factor. Crop factor for Sony Alpha a6500 is More comparisons of Fujifilm X-H1 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Nikon D850 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Sony Alpha a6500 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Sony Alpha a7R III Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Fujifilm X-Pro2 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Fujifilm X-T20 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Nikon D700 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Canon EOS M50 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II Enter your screen size diagonal My screen size is inches Actual size is currently adjusted to screen. If your screen phone, tablet, or monitor is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly. New Cameras » Compare Price List General Brand Sony Fujifilm Camera Model α6500 / Alpha 6500 / Alpha A6500 / A6500 ILCE-6500 X-H1 Camera Type Mirrorless Mirrorless Launch Year December, 2016 February, 2018 Market Status Available in India Available in India Sensor Image Sensor Type Exmor CMOS CMOS Image Sensor Size W x H APS-C mm, Crop Frame APS-C mm Crop Frame DX Effective Pixels Megapixels Megapixels Total pixels Megapixels Max resolution 6000 x 4000 pixels 6000 x 4000 pixels Aspect Ratio 32 11, 32, 169 ISO Rating ISO 100 - 25600 ISO 200 - 12800 expandable min 100 to max 51200 White Balance Presets 7 Custom White Balance Yes Autofocus Point 425 325 Processor Bionz X X-Processor Pro Shutter Minimum Shutter speed 30 sec 30 sec Maximum Shutter speed 1/4000 sec 1/8000 sec Shutter Type Electronically-controlled, vertical-traverse, Focal-plane Shutter Mechanical + Electronic Shutter Continuous Shooting Frame rate 11 fps 14 fps Lens Lens Lens Mount Sony E-mount FUJIFILM X mount Dust reduction system Compatible lenses Sony E-mount Lenses Fujifilm X mount Lens range Focal Length Optical Zoom Aperture Viewfinder Viewfinder Type Electronic Viewfinder XGA OLED Electronic OLED Viewfinder Coverage 100% 100% Viewfinder Magnification Approx -1m-1, with 50 mm Lens at Infinity with 50mm lens Viewfinder Eyepoint Approx. 23 mm from the eyepiece lens, mm from the eyepiece frame Approx. 23 mm Viewfinder Diopric adjustment to + m-1 -4m +2m-1 dpt Display Display Size inch 3 inch Display Type TFT Color, Tilting LCD Monitor TFT Color, Tilting LCD Monitor Touchscreen No Yes Screen Dots 921,600 dots 1,040,000 dots Flash Built in Flash Yes No External Flash Yes via hot shoe Yes with Hot-shoe Flash Type Auto Pop-Up Flash Coverage 6 m ISO 100 Power Battery Model NP-FW50 Li-ion Battery NP-W126S Li-ion Battery Battery Type Rechargeable Li-ion Rechargeable Li-ion Battery Life Approx. 350 shots Approx. 310 shots Battery Life for Video Approx. 70 min Up to 45 min Battery Capacity Connectivity Wi-Fi Wi-Fi Wi-Fi NFC Yes Bluetooth Yes, HDMI Yes Micro-HDMI Type-D Yes Micro-HDMI USB USB 480 Mbit/sec USB 5 GBit/sec GPS No Remote control Yes wired Yes Wired or via smartphone Others Storage Memory Card Type SD/SDHC/SDXC UHS-I compliant, Memory Stick Pro Duo/XC-HG Duo SD/SDHC/SDXC card UHS-II compatible Image File Format JPEG, RAW JPEG, RAW Video File Format MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, / 4K video MOV, Full HD, 4k video recording Body Dimension W x H x D x x mm x x mm x x inch Weight 453 g with batteries 673 g with batteries Body Construction Magnesium Alloy Durability Moisture resistance Colours Black Black We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. This includes cookies from third party social media websites and ad networks. Such third party cookies may track your use on Oneindia sites for better rendering. Our partners use cookies to ensure we show you advertising that is relevant to you. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on Oneindia website. However, you can change your cookie settings at any time. Learn more News, Tips & ReviewsAbout UsThe Professional's Source Since Log InAccount & OrdersMy Cart Two years ago, Fujifilm announced its most popular X-Series camera to date, the X-T2. It was one of many “second generation” mirrorless cameras to hit the market that year and included characteristics one would expect from a high-end product such as a more robust housing, an improved autofocus system and 4K recently announced Fujifilm X-H1 is built upon the strengths of the X-T2, making it the most powerful X-Series camera in the this comparison preview, we’re going to take a look at how the new X-H1 compares to one of its main rivals on the mirrorless market, the Sony a6500. Despite sharing similar characteristics, including a 24MP APS-C sensor, advanced hybrid autofocus system, 5-axis sensor stabilisation and advanced video capabilities, there are quite a few ways in which they differ as we’ll discover statement The information supplied in this article is based on official specifications, press releases and our personal experience with the Sony a6500 and Fujifilm cameras. We were not asked to write anything about these cameras, nor were we provided with any sort of compensation. Within the article, there are affiliate links. If you decided to buy something after clicking the link, we will receive a small commission. To know more about our ethics, you can visit our full disclosure page. Thank you!1. SLR vs. rangefinder designPerhaps the most obvious difference is the physical appearance of the two X-H1 resembles a typical SLR due to its centrally-placed electronic viewfinder EVF. It is both larger and heavier than the a6500 with measurements of x x and a weight of 673g with the battery and memory a6500 weighs approximately 453g with the battery and SD card and measures x x It has a flat-topped rangefinder-type body with the electronic viewfinder located on the left side of the the X-H1 features a thick, scratch-proof chassis that is completely weather-sealed against dust, moisture and cold temperatures down to -10°C, the a6500 only offers dust and moisture resistance. Both bodies feature a prominent grip but the X-H1, being taller, should prove more comfortable to difference that will interest professionals is that the X-H1 has a dual SD card slot with UHS-II compatibility, whereas the a6500 only has one UHS-I. Dual SD card slots are useful, not only because you can record more images but also because a you can make back-ups while shooting and b have the camera record different file types JPG, RAW, MP4 to separate X-H1 comes with a full sized USB port whereas the a6500 comes with a Micro USB 2 port. A hot shoe is present on both bodies but only the a6500 has a built-in pop-up External controls and ease of useA characteristic common to all Fujifilm X-Series cameras is the presence of many physical controls around the the case of the X-H1, you will find the following a stacked ISO/Drive dial, stacked Shutter Speed/Metering dial, front and rear control dials, AF joystick, focus selector on the front and various function buttons around the body. Add to this the small LCD screen on top that displays your settings, remaining battery life and other useful information, and it becomes easy to understand why the Fujifilm camera should give you a more immersive user a6500 has fewer external controls which include the standard PSAM dial, one exposure dial on top and a rear control wheel. There is a good number of function buttons and a customisable Fn menu but it still isn’t as user-friendly as we would like it to menu system on the X-H1 is the same found on the X-T2, which is another advantage it is more straightforward to navigate and learn than the one on the a6500. Both cameras come with a Q Menu / Fn menu that can be worth mentioning is that most Fujinon lenses have a physical aperture dial while many Sony lenses don’ Viewfinder and Rear LCD screenWe already touched upon the location of the X-H1 and a6500’s respective viewfinders but there are also a few other differences worth the X-H1’s is larger vs inches, has a higher resolution vs. dots and a higher magnification vs Second, they offer slightly different refresh rates 50fps and 100fps PAL or 60fps and 120fps NTSC for the Sony, or 60fps / 100fps in Boost mode for the cameras have a 3-inch LCD screen but they work the X-H1 has a three-way tilting monitor that rotates up, down and to one side in order to facilitate both landscape and portrait shooting, the a6500’s screen only tilts up and down. The resolution of the a6500’s screen is also slightly lower at approximately 921k dots versus dots on the tilting mechanism on the X-H1They do share one important feature however and that is touch sensitivity. On the X-H1 you can change the AF point, focus, take a shot, swipe through your images and pinch to zoom. The touch screen can also be used as an AF Pad when composing with the the a6500, the touch screen can only be used to move the focus point which also works when using the viewfinder.4. Sensor and Image QualityAlthough the performance is very similar, there are a few things worth highlighting if you are picky about image quality. The following is based on our X-T2 vs a6500 full comparison, which can give you a good preview of how the two sensors perform since the X-H1 uses the same sensor as the the X-H1 uses an X-Trans array rather than the traditional bayer array, which includes at least one red, green and blue pixel on every horizontal and vertical line of the debate as to whether this technology is an advantage is on-going at the time of writing. In our opinion, the differences aren’t huge but it is true that the Fuji RAW files can perform differently depending on the post production software if you want to maximise sharpness and fine details. The a6500 RAW files by comparison deliver good results with most software Sony has a normal range of ISO 100-25600 and an extended value of 51200. The X-H1 has a native 200-12800 range, pull value down to 100 and push levels up to 51200. The difference in performance between the two sensors is very small, and we’ve found that the Fuji RAW files require less noise reduction to get rid of colour noise. Brightness when shooting at the same ISO value is not exactly the same however the Fuji files are often underexposed by half a stop as both brands use a different ISO range also comes very close. The X-H1 can record 14-bit RAW in lossless compressed or uncompressed, whereas the a6500 records 14-bit compressed difference concerns the picture profiles and colour rendering. Fujifilm has a more subtle yet distinctive colour signature thanks to its film simulation 5-axis stabilisationAlthough we already mentioned this in the introduction, we wanted to highlight a few differences since this technology is a first for cameras can use 5 axes with non-stabilised lenses but the performance can vary with the X-H1 depending on the lens used. While Sony guarantees up to 5 stops of compensation with all native lenses, the X-H1 offers slightly more with a few prime lenses such as the XF 35mm f/ OIS lenses, the a6500 uses 3 axes on the sensor and two Yaw / Pitch axes on the lens. The X-H1 has a similar behaviour although the number of axes used on the sensor may vary depending on the focal length. The performance can decrease to or even with select OIS lenses like the XF Autofocus capabilitiesBoth cameras feature a hybrid autofocus systems consisting of a mix of contrast and phase detection X-H1 has 91 points, with the 49 central ones being phase detection points, covering roughly 40% of the sensor area. In certain modes you can sub-divide them into a 13×25 grid 325 points. XH1 7×13 grid XH1 13×25 gridIt comes with Fujifilm’s AF-C Custom Settings which allow you to customise the speed and reactivity of the autofocus, as well as the area of the image it a6500 has more points 425 phase detection and 169 contrast detection points that cover almost the entire sensor surface. Using its advanced 4D Focus hybrid autofocus system and high-density tracking AF, the camera activates a large number points around a subject to track it more efficiently. 425 phase detection points on the a6500 169 contrast detection points on the a6500When we compared the a6500 to the X-T2 – whose AF system is almost identical to that of the X-H1 – we found that they were equally capable of tracking subjects with precision. That being said, the new camera has an improved algorithm that should increase precision when tracking fast subjects such as birds, so we’ll have to see if this brings a tangible difference in field advantage of the a6500 is that you can easily adapt DSLR lenses and retain excellent AF performance with the right adaptor such as the Sigma Shutter and burst speedsBoth the X-H1 and a6500 have mechanical, electronic and first curtain electronic shutter options but they offer different a6500’s maximum shutter speed is 1/4000s regardless of the shutter mechanism you for the X-H1, the mechanical shutter can reach 1/8000s while the electronic shutter is even faster at 1/32, continuous shooting mode, both cameras can go as fast as 11fps but the vertical battery grip is required to reach this speed with the Fujifilm camera – otherwise the maximum is 8fps. With the electronic shutter, the X-H1 can go as fast as Video capabilitiesThe video capabilities of the X-H1 and a6500 are similar in so far as both can shoot in 4K resolution up to 30fps but there are also a number of differences that may be of interest to video both offer full pixel readout, the a6500 doesn’t crop the sensor. This means that unlike the X-H1, which performs a crop, the field of view doesn’t maximum data rate of the X-H1 is 200Mbps 4K and 1080p whereas the a6500 is capped at 100Mbps for 4K and 50Mbps for Full can record up to 120fps in 1080p which allows you create nice slow motion footage but only the a6500 offers a Quick motion’ option down to maximum time for the a6500 is 30 minutes in 4K and Full HD whereas the X-H1 cannot record for longer than 15 minutes in 4K or 20 minutes in Full HD. However, you can extend the recording time to 30 minutes for both resolutions by attaching the vertical battery find a microphone input but no headphone output on the a6500. On the X-H1 however, you can gain access to one if you attach the optional battery Picture profiles for videoThe X-H1 becomes the second Fujifilm camera after the X-T2 to feature the flat F-Log Gamma profile it allows you to record the vastest dynamic range possible which is useful for grading in post-production. The difference with the X-T2 however is that the X-H1 lets you record it internally to an SD card in 420 8-bit, eliminating the need for an external picture profiles otherwise known as Film Simulation Modes can also be used for video. There is a new one currently exclusive to the X-H1 called Eterna which has been developed for video and gives you a very distinctive cinematic look see the example below by Herman Van Deventer.The a6500 has more picture profiles designed especially for video nine in total. These include in-depth settings such as black gamma, knee, colour depth, colour modes, gamma modes and S-log2 / S-log3 to record the widest dynamic range Native lens selectionThis final point isn’t directly related to the X-H1 and a6500 in and of themselves but rather to lens systems to which are inextricably Sony APS-C lens range, while far from scant, has a disproportionate number of slow aperture lenses. Granted, there are some f/ portrait primes, f/4 zoom lenses, and some third-party primes from Sigma and Zeiss, but if you’re looking for top quality, the Fujifilm X series has more complete lens ecosystem on second issue is that the Sony APS-C lens range isn’t being updated nearly as regularly as the Fujifilm X series. This is because Sony is currently funnelling all R&D into full-frame lenses which, despite having the same E-mount, tend to be too large and dare I say too expensive for APS-C details aside, it is fair to say that the Fujifilm X-H1 and Sony a6500 are actually quite similar, at least as far as the image quality, autofocus and video capabilities are most significant difference, in our opinion, is the handling and user experience. The X-H1, though larger and heavier than the a6500, appears to be a beautifully designed camera with an excellent grip and lots of external controls that are straightforward to use from the moment you unbox it. What’s more, it can benefit from the optional vertical grip that enhances the ergonomics, battery life and performance for demanding the a6500 has compactness on its side but it isn’t quite as user friendly. What’s more, small bodies can be less advantageous when used with a heavy telephoto it comes to the price, however, it is the Sony camera that has a clear upper hand. In fact, by choosing the a6500 body instead of the X-H1, you can expect to save around $500 excluding special offers or discounts. The Sony costs around $1400 / £1350 / €1340 whereas the X-H1 is $1900 / £1700 / €1900 body only.Check the price of the Fujifilm X-H1 on Amazon B&H PhotoCheck price of the Sony a6500 on Amazon Amazon UK B&H Photo eBayEnjoyed this article? Then you may also like the followingFujifilm X-T2 vs X-Pro2 – Complete comparisonFujifilm X-T2 vs X-T20 – Complete comparisonFujifilm X-H1 vs X-T2 – Comparison previewFujifilm X-T2 vs a6500 – Complete comparison

fuji xh1 vs sony a6500